Scott Aaronson personal blog

Scott Aaronson explains his $200k bet (8 Signs A Claimed P≠NP Proof Is Wrong)

As of this writing, Vinay Deolalikar still hasn’t retracted his P≠NP claim, but a clear consensus has emerged that the proof, as it stands, is fatally flawed. The first reason is that we&#82…
Points
106
HN comments
16
Submissions
1
Cited by
14 commenters

Math & AlgorithmsSoftware Engineering2010

On Hacker News

SubmittedTitle on HNPointsComments
Aug 14, 2010Scott Aaronson explains his $200k bet (8 Signs A Claimed P≠NP Proof Is Wrong) by kam10616

Cited in comments

Linked from 15 Hacker News comments by 14 different people, from Aug 2010 to Jul 2021.

Most recent:

Search every comment that links here →

More from Scott Aaronson

All 50 posts →

Related posts from the same era