Apple's Texas-Sized Problem
Link to: https://popular.info/p/apples-texas-problem
Commentary on Apple, technology, design, politics, and more.
Visit daringfireball.net → RSS feedOn Hacker News Jun 2008 – Aug 2026
Tech Industry & Business 146Web & Frontend 64Society, Policy & Culture 61Life, Learning & Writing 17Design & UX 17Security & Privacy 12
Link to: https://popular.info/p/apples-texas-problem
Starting with this week’s new MacBook Air models, Flash Player is no longer bundled with Mac OS X.
Waiting is death, so unless they fix their app, The Daily is dead.
I’m not arguing that it benefits anyone other than Apple itself. I’m just arguing that it makes sense from Apple’s perspective — and it was Apple’s decision to make.
To discount the emotional appeal of Apple’s products is to ignore the entire point of Apple’s products.
I bring this up not to say browsers should not support Ogg Theora — I’m just saying Ogg is a lot closer to being in GIF’s boat than H.264 is.
On the growing sense that Apple is gearing up for war against Google.
Link to: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/meaning-of-open.html
Openness, choice, innovation.
Link to: http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano/msg/f5213577eaeadc47?pli=1
Over the weekend I’ve exchanged a few emails with my source, so that I can explain what happened.
The goal isn’t merely to exceed the resolution of competing devices. The goal is to rival the optical quality of print.
In the traditional model, the primary priority is keeping everything open. In this new model, the primary priority is that the system must always be responsive to the user.
I think it would be good for everyone — Apple, developers, and iPhone users — if unrestricted web apps became a serious alternative to the restricted App Store. But it isn’t credible to argue that they already are.
These PC makers are lacking in neither resources nor opportunity. What they’re lacking is ambition, gumption, and passion for great software and new frontiers.
The future of computing probably is in the direction of thin clients connecting to network services for storage and software, but my hunch is that Chrome OS is too thin.
One thing that strikes me about Chrome OS and Litl is that neither bother trying to do everything Windows or Mac OS X can do. Not even close. I don’t think either even bothers trying to serve as one’s primary computer.
I wish them good luck with this, and I mean that sincerely, but I believe this is a fundamentally flawed strategy.
Regarding Randall Stross’s piece in The New York Times claiming the problem isn’t AT&T’s network, but rather the iPhone’s hardware.
A few choice bits.
Link to: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/dayart/PDF/Gates/gatesmail15.pdf
Is the App Store popular because the iPhone is great? Or is the iPhone great because the App Store is popular?
So Dan Lyons called.
Follow-up points and observations regarding ‘The Android Opportunity’.
What I know, don’t know, and know I don’t know about tomorrow’s WWDC announcements. As usual, please, no wagering.
The key ingredient I see in successful apps, Mac or web — and, really, in creative commercial endeavors of any kind — is that the creators are building something they themselves love.