Publishing AI Slop Is a Choice
Link to: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/24/technology/google-ai-overview-search.html
Commentary on Apple, technology, design, politics, and more.
Visit daringfireball.net → RSS feedOn Hacker News Jun 2008 – Aug 2026
Tech Industry & Business 146Web & Frontend 64Society, Policy & Culture 61Life, Learning & Writing 17Design & UX 17Security & Privacy 12
Link to: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/24/technology/google-ai-overview-search.html
On Malcolm Gladwell’s argument that Jobs was a “tweaker” and not a “large-scale innovator”.
What’s goofy is the idea that Google would do this — to aggressively change Android from a BlackBerry/Windows Mobile competitor into an iPhone competitor — and that anyone would expect Apple not to retaliate, to instead just sit there and take it and allow all other aspects of their previous buddy-buddy corporate…
The Great White Nope.
I have two issues regarding Gizmodo’s actions regarding this story.
On Wednesday afternoon I received a thoughtful email from Apple senior vice president Phil Schiller regarding Ninjawords and the App Store, and I think it bodes well.
Apple wasn’t going to include a front-facing camera until they had software that made it useful in an iPhone-caliber way. HTC is happy to include a front-facing camera and leave its utility (and user experience) in the hands of third-party developers.
This is Apple’s way of asserting that they’re taking over the penthouse suite as the strongest and best company in the whole ones-and-zeroes racket.
Apple’s new privacy rules will only work if Apple enforces them — even in China.
Microsoft is increasingly left only with customers whose priority is price.
How is Google’s argument here different than simply demanding that Apple, Microsoft, Oracle, *et al* should simply sit back and let Google do whatever it wants with Android, regardless of the patents they hold?
Make the Trump administration object. Make them defend the indefensible — in public. Make clear why the apps were removed from the app stores and force Musk — and Trump, if he chooses — to argue that those things are A-OK by them. In court.
No matter what the sport, no matter what the letter of the rulebook says, it’s never a good idea to piss off the refs.
There are two aspects surrounding Apple’s patent litigation against HTC that demand further consideration. First, the severe problems with the U.S. patent system as a whole, particularly regarding software patents. Second, the strategic implications of Apple’s decision to file suit.
It’s one thing to look at today’s Windows 8 on a tablet and say that it has a lot of potential. It’s another thing altogether to look at it and declare victory.
Notes and observations, five days in.
It’s not just that Apple *is* different among computer makers. It’s that Apple is the only one that even *can* be different, because it’s the only one that has its own OS.
Link to: https://popular.info/p/apples-texas-problem
The stakes are incredibly high, and Apple knows it. Whatever you think of Apple’s decision to implement these features, they’re not doing so lightly.
I’m not arguing that it benefits anyone other than Apple itself. I’m just arguing that it makes sense from Apple’s perspective — and it was Apple’s decision to make.
To discount the emotional appeal of Apple’s products is to ignore the entire point of Apple’s products.
On the growing sense that Apple is gearing up for war against Google.
Link to: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/meaning-of-open.html
Openness, choice, innovation.
I wish them good luck with this, and I mean that sincerely, but I believe this is a fundamentally flawed strategy.
Regarding Randall Stross’s piece in The New York Times claiming the problem isn’t AT&T’s network, but rather the iPhone’s hardware.
A few choice bits.
So Dan Lyons called.
What I know, don’t know, and know I don’t know about tomorrow’s WWDC announcements. As usual, please, no wagering.
The key ingredient I see in successful apps, Mac or web — and, really, in creative commercial endeavors of any kind — is that the creators are building something they themselves love.